For Facts about Vitamins, Why Can't Parents Trust Big Pharmaceuticals?

When it comes to children's nutrition facts about vitamins,
it is difficult to know whom to trust because there is so
much disagreement over the effectiveness of vitamins and
supplements and because of corporate media censorship. Yes,
it's true, censorship prevents parents from getting the
whole truth regarding children's nutrition facts about
vitamins.

(I didn't believe media censorship existed until someone
referred me to Sonoma State University web site called
Project Censored).

Focusing on the vitamin controversy, on one side there are
traditional medical doctors and pharmaceutical companies
defending patented medicines and attacking vitamins and
supplements as proving ineffective and even dangerous. On
the opposite side there are alternative physicians and
vitamin companies, not only defending vitamins, but claiming
vitamins are often superior than prescription medications for
treating many diseases.

What are the facts about vitamins?

From the stand point of children's nutrition, since both
sides are influenced by their respective financial
interests involved, it is difficult to determine where the
truth lies by simply relying on their word, particularly
since there exist medical doctors in both camps. However
the truth and credibility of their claims can be evaluated
and this should help parents making decisions concerning
children's nutrition and the facts about vitamins.

Mainstream medicine and the major pharmaceutical companies
have claimed vitamins are dangerous. While there appears
to be agreement in both camps that certain vitamins can be
dangerous, like iron for example, it is with vitamin C
where there, particularly, exists major disagreements.
Hence, we will examine the safety of vitamins, in general,
compared to patented medications and, also, examine the
credibility of those involved in the vitamin C controversy
in order to help us decide whom to believe from a
children's nutrition perspective on the facts about
vitamins.

Below, Dr. Philip Rudnick, Professor Emeritus, Chemistry,
(http://www.thenhf.com/articles_27.htm)cites a five year
study, excerpted from the "Journal of the American Medical
Association" performed between 1993-1998. The findings were
as follows:


    Summary of Comparative Mortality of Drugs and
    Supplements/Herbs:

  • Iatrogenic deaths from non-error adverse effects of
    medication: ~ 106,000/year

  • Deaths from herbs (weight-loss): ~37/year

  • Deaths from supplements: 0-1/year

  • Ratio of iatrogenic deaths from “properly” prescribed
    drugs to deaths from herbs: 2865 ~ 2900/1

  • Ratio of iatrogenic deaths from “properly” prescribed
    drugs to deaths from supplements: =/> 106,000/1.

From a children’s nutrition perspective, it appears one is
more than 106,000 times more likely to die from a correctly
prescribed doctor's prescription than from taking a vitamin
supplement, one of the very important facts about vitamins.

As a quick check on these findings, let's examine this
graph of the statistical comparison of frequent causes of
death in the USA
(www.laleva.cc/petizione/english/ronlaw_eng.html).

Examining the graph, note one has .0001% chance dying from
supplements and a 5.18% chance of dying from properly
prescribed drugs. In other words, correctly prescribed
doctor's prescriptions are 50,000 times more likely to kill
you than vitamin supplements. Children’s nutrition is a lot
safer sticking to vitamins than drugs, even when drugs are
correctly prescribed.

From this information, it appears obvious that vitamin
supplements are safe for children’s nutrition. This being
the case, why do many medical doctors and pharmaceutical
companies warn about their dangers, when the facts about
vitamins support the opposite conclusion that doctor's
correctly prescribed drugs are unsafe, in comparison to
vitamins, and are the fourth leading killer in the United
States after heart disease, cancer and smoking?

From a children’s nutrition perspective, the following
information may prove helpful in evaluating this question.
According to Karl Loren's very credible and extensively
documented web site:



  1. "Now I've got to the point where I think we can get
    almost complete control of cardiovascular disease, heart
    attacks and strokes. The proper use of vitamin C and lysine
    can prevent cardiovascular disease and even CURE it."
    [Linus Pauling, 1994 Interview]

  2. "If you are at risk of heart disease, or if there is a
    history of heart disease in your family, if your father or
    other members of the family died of a heart attack or
    stroke or whatever, or if you have a mild heart attack
    yourself then you had better be taking vitamin C and
    Lysine." [Linus Pauling, 1994 interview]


  3. PAULING THERAPY
    Agent 1Agent 2
    Vitamin C (3-6 gm)L-Lysine (3-6 gm)


  4. "The heart surgery industry is booming. According to
    American Heart Association statistics, in 1995 1,460,000
    angiograms (the diagnostic procedure that starts the ball
    rolling) were performed at an average cost of $10,880 per
    procedure. This resulted in 573,000 bypass surgeries at
    $44,820 a shot, and 419,000 angioplasties (the balloon
    procedure for opening up arteries) at $20,370 each. The
    total bill for these procedures is over $50 billion a year.

  5. The millions of people told that they needed immediate
    surgery to save their lives actually had a 98.4% chance of
    surviving without surgery! [According to the CASE study
    published by the New England Journal of Med., 1983]

  6. Dr. Robert Cathcart, III, MD, reports that he hasn't
    seen a single case of heart disease develop in patients who
    didn't already have a bad heart to begin with. Dr. Cathcart
    has treated over 20,000 patients with high doses of ascorbic
    acid­ vitamin C!

  7. During the 1970s vitamin C consumption in the U.S. rose
    by 300%. Mortality from heart disease decreased by 30% in
    the U.S.,­ the only country with a significant drop in heart
    disease fatalities. Yet, the media and organized medicine
    ignore these facts and disseminate misrepresentations of
    scientific findings regarding the value of vitamin C.

  8. Furthermore, the early findings of Canadian doctors
    Patterson and Willis should not be forgotten. Their research
    indicated that arterial tissue levels of ascorbate (vitamin
    C) are much lower in heart patients when compared with
    controls, and that ascorbate supplementation could reduce
    arterial deposits. This pioneering work should have been
    immediately followed up.

  9. There is evidence that textbooks earlier this century
    contained much more information about vitamin C. Most
    certainly the information about vitamin C and collagen
    production was there. Why the change? Shouldn't we have
    learned even more by now? If Pauling was correct about
    vitamin C, then it is likely the mysterious missing info
    about vitamin C is an intentional omission and constitutes
    scientific fraud.

  10. "A study of 1,605 randomly selected men in Finland, aged
    42 to 60 years, was conducted between 1984 and
    1989. None of the men had evidence of preexisting heart
    disease. After adjusting for other confounding factors, men
    who were deficient in vitamin C had 3.5 times more heart
    attacks than men who were not deficient in vitamin C. The
    scientists' conclusion was, "Vitamin C deficiency, as
    assessed by low plasma ascorbate concentration, is a risk
    factor for coronary heart disease." British Medical Journal
    (Vol 314, Iss 708, 1997)


A great deal of research bolsters Linus Pauling's belief
that vitamin C can prevent heart disease, and both vitamin C
and lysine can reverse heart disease. Why is vitamin C so
effective in reversing heart disease?

According to research by Rath and Pauling a local ascorbate
(vitamin C) deficiency causes a crack to form in an artery.
Then a form of low density lipoprotein, called apo(a) enters
that crack and proceeds to initiate a repair process;
however, this healing process is faulty and results in the
accumulation of a mass of tissue that grows and can
eventually clog the artery. How does vitamin C ameliorate
this heart disease process?

For children’s nutrition and facts about vitamins, let's
count some of the many ways vitamin C prevents and fights
heart disease:


  1. Extra vitamin C may prevent the local ascorbate
    deficiency that caused the arterial crack to form in the
    first place.

  2. Vitamin C prevents endothelial cells lining arteries
    from dying.

  3. Vitamin C increases good HDL cholesterol, which moves
    fat from the arterial wall to the liver.

  4. Vitamin C reduces the production of LDL apo(a).

  5. Vitamin C prevents the decrease in arterial blood flow
    caused by a high cholesterol diet.

  6. Vitamin C decreases the liver's production of
    cholesterol and triglycerides.

  7. Vitamin C prevents dangerous clot formations that might
    cause a sudden stroke or heart attack.


This information about vitamin C adds to the pool of
important facts about vitamins and their effectiveness.

From a children’s nutrition perspective, vitamin C appears
to do all the right things in reducing heart disease. Since
some studies indicate cardiovascular disease can begin in
childhood, extra vitamin C might be a perfect addition to a
children’s nutrition program to prevent heart disease in
children.

The primary cause of cardiovascular disease is local
ascorbate deficiency. The secondary causative factor is LDL
apo (a). Cholesterol lowering drugs don't appear to have
much effect on apo (a), except for niacin, a vitamin. Lysine
along with vitamin C facilitate proper healing and repair
initial crack in the artery and causes the plaque
to shrink.

If a local vitamin C deficiency caused the arterial crack,
it appears obvious that increased vitamin C intake might
prevent the deficiency initiating the crack and, also,
decrease the apo (a) that creates the plaque. Hence,
Linus Pauling's approach to curing heart disease makes
sense-another one of the important facts about vitamins.

Bolstering Dr. Linus Pauling's position is a new book by Dr.
Thomas Levy.
"Dr. Levy is a medical doctor and a
cardiologist by training. Some time ago, Dr. Levy analyzed
all 27 known cardiovascular disease risk factors. Levy
discovered that they all can be reduced to a single
factor- low vitamin C."-another one of the critical facts
about vitamins.

From a children's nutrition perspective, it appears obvious
that the pharmaceutical corporations chose to purposely
attack the credibility of those supporting vitamin C and the
research upholding their support, and hid the knowledge of
vitamin C's effectiveness against heart disease to prevent
the tremendous financial loss they would have experienced
had it become widely known to the American public.

One wonders how many children have died because
pharmaceutical companies chose to hide the facts about
vitamins to protect their very profitable patented drugs
from competition?

From a children's nutrition point of view, it is important to
validate these findings of apparent wrong doing by the
corporate pharmaceutical industry, in regard to vitamin C,
by checking for other supporting evidence outside of the
vitamin C realm. In other words, if there proves to be
evidence of widespread wrong doing by Big Pharma, in
general, this would support contentions that Big Pharma
acted inappropriately in regard to vitamin C and support
the allegation that they chose to hide the facts about
vitamins to protect their profits.

Marcia Angell, a faculty member of the Harvard Medical
School and a former editor of the New England Journal of
Medicine, in her book, The Truth About the Drug
Companies,
discusses the following ways drug companies
deceive Americans:


  1. It plies attending physicians with expense-paid junkets
    to St. Croix and Key West, Fla., where they are given
    honoraria and consulting fees to listen to promotional
    presentations.

  2. It promotes new or little-known diseases such
    as "social anxiety disorder" and "premenstrual dysphoric
    disorder" as a way of selling the drugs that treat them.

  3. It sets up phony front groups disguised as "patient
    advocacy organizations."

  4. It hires ghostwriters to produce misleading scientific
    articles and then pays academic physicians to sign on as
    authors.

  5. It sends paid lackeys and shills out onto the academic
    lecture circuit to ''educate" doctors about a drug's
    unapproved uses.

  6. It hires multinational PR firms to trumpet dubious
    studies as scientific breakthroughs while burying the
    studies that are likely to harm sales.

  7. It buys up the results of publicly funded research.

  8. It maintains a political chokehold on the American
    public by donating more money to political campaigns than
    any other industry in the country.


Big Pharma has a well organized team of strategies to
prevent the facts about vitamins from reaching the American
public.

If Big Pharma's hiding the facts about vitamins isn't
enough, read this:


  • For many years the drug industry has reaped the highest
    profit margins of any industry in America.

  • In 2002, the top 10 American drug companies had profit
    margins of 17 percent; Pfizer, the largest, had profit
    margins of 26 percent.

  • In 2002 the combined profits for the top 10 drug
    companies in the Fortune 500 were greater than those of all
    the other 490 companies combined.

  • In 2003, pharmaceutical corporation and their executives were
    accused of genocide and war crimes before the International
    Criminal Court in The Hague.


    For children's nutrition, who can parents trust for the
    facts about vitamins? Not Big Pharma. The affect on
    children's nutrition of such behavior is difficult to
    determine, but one thing is for certain, it must have taken
    a staggering toll over the decades, not just on children's
    nutrition, but on the quality of life four children and
    even in the death of many children. Other sources confirm
    this influence on children's nutrition and hiding the facts
    about vitamins.

    From Fraud and the Pharmaceutical Industry, we find more
    evidence of wrong doing by the industry in question:


    • (Concerning vitamin price fixing) "On a daily basis for
      the past 10 years, every American consumer paid to eat and
      drink or use a product whose price was artificially
      inflated," Reno said.

      The vitamin cartel was the "most pervasive and harmful
      criminal antitrust conspiracy ever uncovered,"
      said
      Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein, Reno's antitrust
      chief. Drug Makers To Pay Top Fine in Price Fix
      Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee) May 21, 1999,
      Friday

      Criminal prosecutions $850 million (for Vitamin Price
      Fixing)

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Largest fines from Sherman Act violations
      1999 F. Hoffmann-La Roche ----- Vitamins --- $500 million
      1999 BASF ------------------- Vitamins -----$225 million
      1999 Takeda Chemical Industries - Vitamins ----- $72 million
      1999 Eisai ------------------- Vitamins ---- $40 million
      1999 Daiichi Pharmaceutical ----- Vitamins ---- $25 million
      1999 Pfizer ----- Maltol/sodium erythorbate --- $20 million
      FROM Ongoing price-fixing investigations USA TODAY July 10, 2000
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      (Then there was Pfizer).

    • Pfizer is by far the largest and most powerful of the
      multinational drug companies. Its wealth exceeds that of
      many countries. It probably exerts the greatest political
      influence. It was accused of influencing the Australian
      Minister for Health's office and undermining the activities
      of the PBAC, the body which controls the listing of drugs
      for Medicare payments and their pricing in Australia.
      Pfizer was in dispute over some of its drugs. Two government
      officials from the minister's department later joined
      Pfizer.

      Pfizer paid out US $49 million to settle allegations of
      defrauding Medicaid.

    • Avotek is an example of the lengths to which some drug
      companies have gone to tie researchers into confidentiality
      agreements and so prevent publication of data which
      challenges the effectiveness or safety of their products.
      In the Olivieri case in Canada both the university and the
      hospital which employed Olivieri were beneficiaries of
      Avotek research money. When she refused to remain silent
      about her adverse findings she was hounded by Avotek. The
      university and hospital did not support her. There are
      other examples where researchers have been harried by
      corporations primarily concerned for their bottom line.


      The number of illicit and immoral activities by the
      pharmaceutical industry are far too numerous and egregious
      to all name here. Yet it gives one a good idea of who not
      to put our trust in, regarding children’s nutrition and
      certainly their war, regarding the facts about vitamins is
      not to be trusted.

      For more Big Pharma fraud information that may prove useful
      in your decisions, regarding children's nutrition and facts
      about vitamins, go to: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/
      bmartin/ dissent/documents/health/pharmgen.html#RESEARCH.

      The aforementioned page describes how pharmaceutical
      research has been corrupted to suit the bottom line, how
      doctors prescribing protocols are monitored via computers,
      and those doctors not prescribing "properly," according to
      corporate pharmaceutical standards, are pressured to
      conform.

      (I am not surprised at such behavior. Shortly after I
      graduated from optometry school, I began working in
      association with an optical corporation that attempted to
      pressure me into prescribing tints for spectacles when they
      were not needed. I reported them to my local optometric
      association.)

      You will find how Congress is controlled by pharmaceutical
      lobbyists, 2 lobbyists per congressman, and the money
      lavished upon them for their votes, not a pretty picture
      for the future of children’s nutrition. Finally, you will
      discover how the big pharmaceuticals have established front
      companies posing as ordinary citizens groups, but in
      reality acting for and paid for by Big Pharma.

      In the interests of facts about vitamins, it is important
      to note that people, like Dr. Stephen Barret, MD., have
      attempted to debunk Dr. Linus Pauling here:
      http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html

      Who is Dr. Barret? He is supposedly a quackbuster that has
      turned out to be a rather disreputable fellow himself,
      according to, http://www.rense.com/general62/wbs.htm:


      "The "quackbusters," we know, are a subversive operation
      started in the United States shortly after the American
      Medical Association (AMA) lost a Federal court case to the
      Chiropractors (Wilk v. AMA). In that case the chiropractic
      profession rightly, and successfully, accused the medical
      profession of attempting, through covert operation, to shut
      down, or damage the chiropractors as a competitive health
      profession.. They won their case - and the AMA was ordered
      to shut down their operation.

      About six months later twenty six (26) drug companies
      began, and originally funded, the current "quackbuster,"
      operation. For several years the "quackbusters," were
      successful.

      Today, the "quackbusters," those you see, are a motley lot,
      led, they would have you believe, by failed MD Stephen
      Barrett through his boring, and repetitive,
      "quackwatch.com" website. "Quackwatch. com" is
      the quackbuster's "bible." On that site, and their
      dubious "web-ring" you'll find a condemnation of anything,
      and everything, that competes with the use of drugs, drugs,
      and more drugs.

      Barrett, quackwatch.com, the NCAHF, Robert Baratz, and
      others, have all, recently, been named in a FEDERAL
      Racketeering (RICO) lawsuit in Colorado (CAVITAT v. Aetna
      Insurance). Aetna has filed four separate "Motions for
      Dismissal" in this case, and has been rebuffed each time.
      Depositions will soon begin of quackbuster leaders.

      The Media - What the New York Times, and other major media
      are NOT YET covering, is Big Pharma's marketing "black-
      ops," the "quackbuster," operation. As everyone in
      the "health" world knows, Big Pharma's "quackbuster,"
      operation was designed to damage, and discredit, any, and
      all, Natural health care methods, herbals, oxygen
      therapies, energy medicine, etc... - anything, and
      everything that competes with the use of drugs, drugs, and
      more drugs."

      Again don't expect to get the facts about vitamins from Big
      Pharma, not when the facts about vitamins competes with
      their drugs.

      For the sake of children's nutrition and the facts about
      vitamins, it is important for parents to know about the
      massive attempts by the pharmaceutical industry to use
      doctors as fronts to ruin the reputation of vitamins and
      those who prescribe them. Without this knowledge,
      children's nutrition and the facts about vitamins would be
      left at the mercy of Big Pharma. Without this knowledge,
      parents would be misled concerning children’s nutrition.

      The massive attempts to damage the reputation of both Dr.
      Linus Pauling and vitamin C by the pharmaceutical industry
      suggest they fear what might transpire if the truth about
      vitamin C and the facts about vitamins were publicized.
      For children's nutrition it suggests that vitamin C may be
      the most important vitamin children can take. Why
      otherwise would Big Pharma go to such great expense to
      discredit it?

      Despite all the trumped up research, negative publicity
      about vitamin C, pressure on medical doctors to do as they
      are told, that has, no doubt, led to vast suffering and
      deaths, due to Big Pharmas misinformation campaign
      concerning vitamin C and other facts about vitamins, there
      exists on the horizon a greater danger for children's
      nutrition and facts about vitamins, and that is the
      elimination of all vitamins except under doctor's
      prescription!

      This would put all vitamins under Big Pharma's control.
      This would eliminate any hope for vitamins in children's
      nutrition. That's just what will occur on December 31,
      2009, if something isn't done.

      Children's nutrition would suffer since, according to Dr.
      Rima Laibow, M.D.,
      Codex Alimentarius, a weapon of the
      World Trade Organization, will take away Americans rights
      to vitamins. Worse still, it will mandate that all milk sold.
      in the US contain bovine growth hormone. See her video at:
      www.healthfreedomusa.org.

      What's more, according to this article:


      (Dr.) Rima Laibow has done the math, she claims, using
      figures coming directly from the WHO and FAO. And according
      to those epidemiological projections, she believes that just
      the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline alone will result in about
      3 billion deaths. “1 billion through simple starvation,” she
      says. “But the next 2 billion, they will die from the
      preventable diseases of under-nutrition.”

      She calls the new Codex standards “food regulations that are
      in fact the legalization of mandated toxicity and under-
      nutrition.”


      The evidence cited above proves that the pharmaceutical
      industry cannot be counted upon to give parents credible
      information on the facts about vitamins. Since most
      traditional doctors are heavily influenced by the
      pharmaceutical industry, and are virtually forced to stick
      to common prescribing practices and treatments like others
      in their field or be faced with, not only punishment by
      their medical boards but increased vulnerability to
      lawsuits, it must be assumed that they too are not to be
      counted upon when it comes to the facts about vitamins.

      What about the mainstream media, can parents count upon them
      for reliable information, concerning children’s nutrition?

      According to an article in Progressive Living, due to continuing
      corporate buyouts, American corporations have become
      interlocking centers of power, resulting in corporate
      influence preventing stories from reaching the American
      public that might adversely affect the bottom line. For
      example, if within these interlocking corporation centers,
      there exists both a media company and a pharmaceutical
      company, the media company could be dissuaded from
      announcing any stories inimical to the pharmaceutical
      company.

      Furthermore, another story, publicized by Project Censored,
      cited the following quote:

      "In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously
      agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule
      against distorting or falsifying the news in the United
      States."

      Hence, not only can the corporate media legally lie to the
      American public, but according to former CIA Director
      William Colby, "The Central Intelligence Agency owns
      everyone of any significance in the major media."

      Regarding the facts about vitamins, children's nutrition
      can count on neither the media nor the pharmaceutical
      industry as a truthful source of information, what about
      the government? To be specific, can children count on the
      Food & Drug Administration, the FDA, to protect them and
      their right to the facts about vitamins?

      In 1999, the FDA lost a case where Durk Pearson, a famed
      scientific researcher, made four health claims for his
      products, regarding facts about vitamins. All claims were
      backed by solid scientific evidence, but still the FDA had
      refused to approve the claims until they lost their case in
      court. Based on the> evidence, these products could save
      such products, products that would probably prove a godsend
      to children's nutrition?

      In the article "Conflicts of interest: How Big Pharma
      influences the FDA's drug approval process at the expense
      of public safety," published on December 13, 2005 by Alexis
      Black, she details how large pharmaceutical corporations
      influence the FDA to the detriment and sometimes the death
      of Americans.

      Another article, entitled, "Donald Rumsfeld and Aspartame,"
      details how a dangerous neurotoxin, aspartame, was approved
      by the FDA, through Rumsfeld hiring the new head of the FDA,
      even though the FDA's own records indicated how dangerous
      Aspartame was. It's been responsible for over 10,000
      complaints, 92 symptoms and death.

      From a children’s nutrition perspective, unfortunately, it
      appears parents cannot even rely on the FDA's advice,
      regarding the facts about vitamins.

      Summary of findings, regarding children’s nutrition and the
      facts about vitamins:


      • It's been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that
        vitamins are thousands of times safer than properly
        prescribed doctor's medications.

      • It's seems clear that the pharmaceutical industry
        attempted to discredit Dr. Linus Pauling because of his
        belief and documented body of supporting research that
        indicated vitamin C, could not only prevent or cure heart
        disease, but be helpful in the treatment of many disorders-
        one of the many important facts about vitamins.

      • It's, not only clear that big pharmaceutical companies
        have been frequently involved in immoral, illegal and
        corrupt practices infecting medical doctors, researchers,
        universities, and even the government itself, but that with
        the upcoming Codex guidelines, they intend to continue with
        these practices, which could lead to 3 billion human deaths
        worldwide.

      • Due to corporate influence parents cannot trust the
        corporate media nor the FDA for reliable information on
        children's nutrition and facts about vitamins.

      • To the detriment of children's nutrition and health,
        corporations are too focused on the bottom line to be a
        reliable source of information. It is likely that most
        people on the corporate payroll cannot be trusted as well.


      Who can parents trust, regarding facts about vitamins?


      1. Linus Pauling can be trusted and researchers of his ilk
        that stood against corporate fraud and remained uninfluenced
        by the corporate state.

      2. Medical doctors and other professionals, whom through
        their own experience and research have become prescribers of
        vitamins and supplements, are more likely to be trustworthy, regarding facts about vitamins.

      3. Older research, unfortunately, not found in many
        corporate controlled medical information banks is probably
        more trustworthy as well since it appears that the older the
        research, the more likely that it will not be fraudulent, regarding facts about vitamins.

      4. Information on the internet that is not under corporate
        influence is likely to be more truthful.

      5. Do your own research, or hire someone to do it for you.
        Your own research should turn out to be the most credible of
        all.

      6. The bad news is that, to a large extent, the media,
        FDA, and the big pharmaceutical companies have been
        deceiving parents on the facts about vitamins. Realize
        that there is good news in the bad news. That is to say,
        inexpensive vitamins and supplements can cure and
        alleviate more diseases than we ever imagined.

      7. Linus Pauling says vitamins and supplements can defeat heart
        disease, the number one killer in the US. Other credible
        experts claim that B-17 can prevent cancer and defeat it if
        taken soon enough. This is great news for children's
        nutrition and facts about vitamins. Why
        would big pharmaceuticals have tried their best to
        discredit Linus Pauling and vitamin research in general, if
        it wasn't effective?

      8. Bolstering the crucial important facts about vitamins in the
        treatment of disease is the fact vitamins, not only have
        genetic influences, but they can compensate for bad genes
        (mutations). What's more, according to Dr. Bruce Ames,
        famous microbiologist at U.C. Berkeley, vitamins have
        already been used to treat more than 50 different
        genetically determined diseases.

      9. Now that we know vitamins and supplements are effective
        in treating disease and maintaining our health, it is important
        to seek help in devising your children's nutrition program
        from credible medical doctors and other health experts who know the facts about vitamins.

      10. Potentially, if proper children’s nutrition changes were
        made, along with sound medical advice on the facts about
        vitamins and other safe and effective supplements, a new
        era could be ushered in for mankind, an era where almost
        all children would be born normally, calm, with high IQs,
        standing and walking earlier, with superior motor
        coordination, more disease resistant, happier and healthier
        than ever before in human history, and, therefore, better
        able to achieve humanity's true potential.


      For more facts about vitamins and the importance of vitamins on health, click here.

      Does bioidentical oral progesterone work to increase IQ?


      footer for facts about vitamins page