Why Child Nutrition, Due to Imprinting, is the Single Most Critical Factor Determining Human Health

Did you know that child nutrition, at the right time of
your baby's life, could make the difference between mental
and physical retardation versus robust mental and physical
health, or even determine whether or not your child's IQ
was 135, rather than the average 100?

According to respected researcher and biologist, Dr. Ray
Peat (google Ray Peat, "Progesterone: Essential to Your Well
Being"):


Recent studies imply that about half the children identified
as hyperactive have experienced prenatal stress. The most
urgent need for progesterone therapy, I think, is preventing
a continuing epidemic of brain damage.
Beyond that, many
studies have found that the use of natural progesterone
increases a child's IQ, typically by around 35 points and
produces personalities that are more "independent,
individualistic, self-assured, self-sufficient and
sensitive" (J.M. Reinish, The Female Patient, April, 1978,
p.87).


Well, it appears that child nutrition can produce such a
crucial difference, but, only, at the right time. When is
that time where child nutrition exerts its optimal affect?

The time for maximal child nutrition influence is prior to
your baby's birth.

It is self-evident that child nutrition is an important
factor in determining a kid's health. Yet, one's genetic
inheritance is often assumed to be of equal or of more
importance, particularly since genes appear unalterable.
Hence, we might hear that nature, that is to say genes,
determine 75% of heart health and nurture, determines the
other 25%. This is called the nature versus nurture debate.

However, this belief that nature, in the final analysis, was
the ultimate determiner of human health failed to consider
the influence of child nutrition in utero, that is to say,
the effect of child nutrition on the fetus, the unborn
baby.

When this vital time, called imprinting, is taken into
consideration, child nutrition becomes the single most
dominant factor determining your child's health and,
therefore, his or her future success.

Imprinting means that there exists a certain time in the
development of the unborn baby where affects of hormones,
vitamins and other internal child nutrition factors within
the womb, will have a maximal influence on, not only the
unborn baby's health, but on its later health during its
entire human life cycle.

One of the critical child nutrition factors during this
period of imprinting is the hormone, progesterone. Sterling
Morgan, in an excellent article, cites the importance of
this hormone below (google Sterling Morgan progesterone for
the complete article):


"What if there was a natural substance that when used by a
pregnant woman could:


  • Protect the fetus from miscarriage
  • Increase the feeling of well being of the mother
  • Increase the potential IQ of the child, and
  • Produce calmer, less colicky babies!

That substance exists, and it is natural progesterone. We
are not speaking about a synthetic drug like Provera, but
rather one made from the extract of the Wild Mexican Yam,
which precisely duplicates the chemical structure of natural
progesterone as produced by the human body.

Ask your doctor about progesterone and pregnancy, and he or
she will probably tell you that the female produces up to 10
times more endogenous progesterone while pregnant.

If you are asking about taking progesterone during
pregnancy, you will most likely be told that it can be
harmful to the fetus. However, the doctor is talking about
synthetic progesterone, called “progestins”
or “progestogens”, not the natural substance. Synthetic
progestins are manufactured in the lab, and while they
perform some of the functions of the natural type, they
also block other important biological functions, such as the
body’s own production of progesterone.

Since a developing fetus actually requires natural
progesterone for its growth and well being, which is why the
body produces much more during pregnancy, it is easy to see
why anything which lessens the natural substance could be
harmful. Since the natural version is rather inexpensive and
unpatentable, drug companies make the synthetic kind and
then ask users to live with the many side effects.

What the doctor probably won’t know is that over 25 years
ago, a British doctor named Katerina Dalton researched the
supplemental use of natural progesterone for pregnancy. She
found that the children of mothers treated with it actually
had faster development of motor skills, higher intelligence,
graduated from college more often. They were calmer, better
adjusted babies than the babies whose mothers did not take
it.

In an article published in 1968 in the British Journal of
Psychiatry, Dalton studied 60 children at the age of one
year. Twenty-nine of these were born to mothers who used
supplemental natural progesterone during pregnancy. The
mothers of the other 31 did not use any. Over 90% of
the “progesterone” children were standing by age one,
compared to only 60% of the “non-progesterone” children.
Also at age one, over 60% of the “progesterone” children
were walking, compared to about 35% of the
“non-progesterone” children.

Even more significantly, Dalton followed a different group
of 79 children and related their school grades to whether
their mothers had taken natural progesterone during
pregnancy. She used a scale from 0 to 100% to measure their
scholastic achievement in various subjects at school. This
scale did not reflect actual grades received, but was an
arbitrary method of measuring success.

In all cases, “progesterone” children did better than
the “non-progesterone” children, but in some cases the
results were astounding! She also discovered that the best
results occurred when the progesterone was started before
the 16th week of pregnancy. Math skills were three times as
high (60% to 20%) in progesterone children, and this was
only for those whose mothers took it before the 16th week.
For mothers who took it after the 16th week, the scores were
30%, still a 50% improvement over non-progesterone children.

(The chief cause of early pregnancy loss is failure of
increased progesterone production). Some doctors find that
women with autoimmune fertility related problems are best
treated with progesterone through the 16th week.-
http://repro-med.net/papers/progest.php


Progesterone children scored much higher than
non-progesterone in verbal reasoning skills, academic
subjects, and significantly better in physical education and
English. In fact, the only skill where non-progesterone
children scored almost as high as the progesterone children
was in crafts.

Finally, children whose mothers used natural progesterone
were about seven times more likely to gain entrance to a
university than their non-progesterone counter parts. A
possible reason for the apparent increase in IQ and
academic performance seems to be natural progesterone’s
ability toretain glucose in the blood stream, thus
elevating it and improving child nutrition. Since the
fetus’ developing brain needs all the glucose it can get,
natural progesterone allows more to reach it, and it may
develop more than the brain of a baby whose mother did not
take supplemental natural progesterone."


Note that Dr. Dalton, not only concluded natural
progesterone is safe to use during pregnancy, she
recommended it. Progesterone's importance in contributing
to the health and development of the unborn fetus cannot be
over emphasized. Since progesterone’s effects influence the
child even after birth, thus reflecting on child rearing, is
why I’ve included it here.

However, there exist many other important nutrients and
hormones that affect child nutrition, such as thyroid, which,
according to one article in the New England Journal of
Medicine, prevented an IQ drop of seven points in children
of hypothyroid mothers. For accurate information,
concerning progesterone, thyroid and other nutrients, search
the internet for books and articles by Dr. Katerina
Dalton, Dr. Ray Peat and Dr. John Lee. Please take special
care not to confuse progesterone with Provera.

In a 1997 study (see: http://altmedangel.com/estrogen.htm)by
Formby and Wiley, they found other potential child nutrition
affects, such as:

  • Progesterone Boosts the Gene that Causes Cancer Cells To
    Die

  • Estrogen Boosts the Gene that Cause Cancer Cells Not to
    Die

  • Topical Progesterone reduced cell proliferation by 410%

  • Topical Estrogen increased cell proliferation by 223%

  • Topical Estrogen/Progesterone combination reduced cell
    proliferation by 16%


As if the potential child nutrition affects of progesterone
already covered are not enough, Dr. Uzzi Reiss, Beverly
Hills gynecologist and obstetrician confirms these findings
and adds:

Progesterone, on the other hand, is the most protective
breast hormone...It increases the activity of a gene called
P53, which protects us from cancer. It also down regulates
and decreases the function of BCL2, a gene that causes
cancer. Progesterone prevents cells from replicating.
Progesterone causes adhesion in the cell. There are many
other detailed functions of progesterone that decrease
cancer in the body. It also moves estrogen from a strong
state to a less strong state. Medroxyprogesterone acetate
(progestin), on the other hand, does the opposite. (See:
(http://www.cbs.com/cbs_cares/menopause/menopause_interview_uzzi.shtml)

Points to remember:


  1. Because of the dominance of imprinting, child nutrition
    is the single most important factor determining the mental
    and physical health of your child.

  2. Progesterone babies stood and walked sooner than
    non-progesterone babies.

  3. Scholastically, every progesterone child outperformed
    the non-progesterone babies.

  4. Math skills proved three times higher for progesterone
    children who began taking progesterone prior to the
    sixteenth week of pregnancy.

  5. Progesterone children scored significantly higher in
    verbal reasoning skills, academic subjects, English and
    physical education.

  6. The critical period of imprinting appeared to be prior
    to the sixteenth week of pregnancy.

  7. Progesterone adults were seven times more likely to
    gain entrance to a university than non-progesterone adults.

  8. Progesterone could raise children's IQ by 35 points (to
    about 135) and greatly decrease, if not eliminate, the
    plague of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders.
    (Note an IQ of 135 is not only higher than 98% of those
    taking the test but is considered in the borderline genius
    to genius range).

  9. One way progesterone blocks cancer is by boosting the
    gene causing cancer cells to die, as well as, exhibiting
    other cancer blocking affects.


Prior to birth, there is a natural die off of brain cells.
It appears that progesterone supplies increased glucose to
the baby's brain decreasing this brain cell die off. This
is reminiscent of mothers who are borderline diabetics that
often have children with higher IQs due to the increase in
glucose of their blood.

Possible actions:


  1. Prospective mothers should consider seeing a child
    nutrition oriented medical professional prior to and during
    their pregnancy.

  2. Consider what the effects of such a child nutrition
    program would be if advertised and instituted on a national
    basis! For example, it could virtually eliminate mental
    retardation. It could, not only decrease the likelihood of
    diseases, like Alzheimer's and cancer, but of all human
    diseases later in life. The results for our children and
    our nation could be revolutionary from both health and
    economic perspectives.

  3. Such a child nutrition program, if instituted nation
    wide, could prevent the coming health care economic
    crisis.

Given the above information, regarding the healthful effects
of natural progesterone on child nutrition, the question
comes to mind, why haven't these revolutionary positive
affects been publicized? Unfortunately for child nutrition,
the answer, according to this video,
is that good health
means less profit for the large pharmaceutical corporations.

Widespread use of progesterone, as part of a national
pregnancy nutrition program could prove an economic
nightmare to the large pharmaceutical corporations. It's
been reported that in the past, when confronted by such a
disastrous economic prospect, sudden dire warnings, for
example, of the cancer causing effects of such a supplement,
appeared in the media to panic consumers into not using such
remarkable remedies.

In this regard, the phrase, follow the money, appears very
appropriate when applied to the pharmaceutical industry.
According to the following article, cited by Dr. Joseph
Mercola:


"On the matter of the 'fact creation' process, renowned
author John Le Carre recently stated:

"Big Pharma [the industry in general] is engaged in the
deliberate seduction of the medical profession, country by
country, worldwide. It is spending a fortune on
influencing, hiring and purchasing academic judgment to a
point where, in a few years' time, if Big Pharma continues
unchecked on its present happy path, unbought medical
opinion will be hard to find." (The Nation, New York,
Interview with John Le Carre, 9th April 2001)"


In the nature versus nurture controversy, the corporate
pharmaceutical industry tends to argue for the nature
perspective since that means genes are responsible for
disease and not nutrition. Each gene is reponsible for each
distinct disorder, and, thus, at stake are millions of
patentable medicines and procedures of treatment,
representing billions of dollars in profits.

Imagine the billions of dollars big pharma stands to lose if
it got out that nutrition is the single most critical factor
determining human health; in other words, if people realized
most diseases could be diminished or eliminated through
relatively inexpensive nutritive treatments.

Hence, parents must do their own research in regards to
child nutrition, always keeping in mind, follow the money;
that is to say, keeping in mind the influence of big pharma
promoting their profit driven perspective.





Do you know the secret behind good study skills? Strategic study
skills prove crucial for getting good grades now. When I learned
good study skills my grades at Cal went from C's to A's. The
Method is a no nonsense, no hype, 36 page study guide, detailing
strategic study skills, so you can get good grades now, or pass
almost any type of exam or test like the SAT, GRE, LSAT, MCAT,
OCAT, and real estate.

On the Optometry College Admission Test my lowest score was 95.
In two other areas I scored the highest score possible 99
because The Method taught me good study skills.

The study skills presented will help you pass any examination.
Few people understand the secret behind study skills for
attaining good grades now. The Method details, specifically,
these secret study skills so you can succeed in high school,
university, grad school or in any occupational exam. Click "THE
METHOD" tab for more information.

Consider buying my book as a donation to keep this web site
going.

footer for child nutrition page